State Senator Owen H. Johnson (4th Senate District, Babylon), Chairman of the Finance Committee, announced that the Senate will act on major property tax relief legislation (S.8522) he supports that would result in the complete elimination of school property taxes in school districts that vote to phase them out over five years. The revenue would be replaced by additional State funding. The plan, known as New York STOP TAXING OUR PROPERTY (NY-STOP), would reduce school property taxes by 20 percent a year until they are eliminated after five years, rather than simply capping property tax increases, as the Suozzi Commission has proposed. “The most pressing concern expressed by those I represent is unbearable property taxes that continue to rise,” said Senator Johnson. “My Senate colleagues and I have not only fought to increase school aid year after year, we’ve stood up to win increased STAR rebates and to create and preserve the STAR program. Despite these efforts to provide relief, property taxes continue to rise and the people who pay the bill are not only frustrated, they’re hurting,” said Senator Johnson. “New York Stop Taxing Our Property would reduce property taxes by 20 percent per year. It’s a real solution to a growing problem that begs to be addressed.” Senator Johnson explained that the STOP TAXING OUR PROPERTY plan would: give school district voters the authority to eliminate residential property taxes over five years, with revenue replaced by additional State funding; and allow localities the option to put a local tax cap in place. Most importantly, STOP TAXING OUR PROPERTY would reduce taxes 20 percent a year rather than limit the year-to-year property tax increase to 4 percent. Meanwhile, as part of STOP TAXING OUR PROPERTY, local school districts would also have the option to authorize a local property tax cap if district residents voted to do so through a petition and voting process, allowing localities to have the flexibility they need to address unique district-by-district challenges. The plan would be paid for through existing revenue in the State Budget, just as the State satisfied the Campaign for Fiscal Equity (CFE) lawsuit and provided additional funding for New York and other high-needs school districts throughout the State. In addition, passage of NY-STOP would signal that the Legislature and Governor are committed to providing property tax relief to homeowners who are challenged by high property taxes, high gas prices, and the high costs of basic grocery staples like bread, milk and eggs. ELIMINATING RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY TAXES Under the provisions of NY-STOP, every school district would be authorized to take a public vote to determine if real property taxes on primary residences (STAR eligible properties only) would be phased out over five years and be replaced with additional State funding. This vote would be held on the third Tuesday in May (school district budget vote day). The proposition would be placed on the ballot only after the submission of a petition which contained at least 25 percent of those who voted in the previous school budget vote (or in the previous general election in the Big Five cities). Districts which enter into this system would be required to reduce residential real property taxes on primary homes by 20 percent annually until such tax was eliminated after five years. A new state aid formula would be created to fully reimburse districts for this reduction in local tax collections. After five years, the formula would provide districts with an annual school aid cost-of-living increase. If all school districts opted to eliminate residential property taxes, the total annual cost would be approximately $2.34 billion or $11.7 billion over five years. Under the new system, property taxes on other properties (i.e. second homes, apartments and businesses) would continue under the current taxing system. Districts which do not enter into this financing system would continue under the existing property tax structure. “A guaranteed cut in real property taxes is highly preferable to the all but certain 4 percent tax increase that a cap would offer,” said Senator Johnson. “I hope the Assembly acts on this legislation so that we can send it to Governor Paterson for his consideration. This is the kind of relief that Long Island taxpayers desperately need.” In addition to NY-STOP, the Senate was set to act on two bills that would provide additional relief to taxpayers, including mandate relief legislation to reduce costs to school districts, municipalities and local taxpayers, and a measure to provide enhanced financial incentives for school districts which merge or share a superintendent.
The plan, known as New York STOP TAXING OUR PROPERTY (NY-STOP), would reduce school property taxes by 20 percent a year until they are eliminated after five years, rather than simply capping property tax increases, as the Suozzi Commission has proposed.
“The most pressing concern expressed by those I represent is unbearable property taxes that continue to rise,” said Senator Johnson. “My Senate colleagues and I have not only fought to increase school aid year after year, we’ve stood up to win increased STAR rebates and to create and preserve the STAR program. Despite these efforts to provide relief, property taxes continue to rise and the people who pay the bill are not only frustrated, they’re hurting,” said Senator Johnson. “New York Stop Taxing Our Property would reduce property taxes by 20 percent per year. It’s a real solution to a growing problem that begs to be addressed.”
Senator Johnson explained that the STOP TAXING OUR PROPERTY plan would: give school district voters the authority to eliminate residential property taxes over five years, with revenue replaced by additional State funding; and allow localities the option to put a local tax cap in place. Most importantly, STOP TAXING OUR PROPERTY would reduce taxes 20 percent a year rather than limit the year-to-year property tax increase to 4 percent.
Meanwhile, as part of STOP TAXING OUR PROPERTY, local school districts would also have the option to authorize a local property tax cap if district residents voted to do so through a petition and voting process, allowing localities to have the flexibility they need to address unique district-by-district challenges.
The plan would be paid for through existing revenue in the State Budget, just as the State satisfied the Campaign for Fiscal Equity (CFE) lawsuit and provided additional funding for New York and other high-needs school districts throughout the State. In addition, passage of NY-STOP would signal that the Legislature and Governor are committed to providing property tax relief to homeowners who are challenged by high property taxes, high gas prices, and the high costs of basic grocery staples like bread, milk and eggs.
ELIMINATING RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY TAXES
Under the provisions of NY-STOP, every school district would be authorized to take a public vote to determine if real property taxes on primary residences (STAR eligible properties only) would be phased out over five years and be replaced with additional State funding. This vote would be held on the third Tuesday in May (school district budget vote day).
The proposition would be placed on the ballot only after the submission of a petition which contained at least 25 percent of those who voted in the previous school budget vote (or in the previous general election in the Big Five cities). Districts which enter into this system would be required to reduce residential real property taxes on primary homes by 20 percent annually until such tax was eliminated after five years.
A new state aid formula would be created to fully reimburse districts for this reduction in local tax collections. After five years, the formula would provide districts with an annual school aid cost-of-living increase.
If all school districts opted to eliminate residential property taxes, the total annual cost would be approximately $2.34 billion or $11.7 billion over five years.
Under the new system, property taxes on other properties (i.e. second homes, apartments and businesses) would continue under the current taxing system. Districts which do not enter into this financing system would continue under the existing property tax structure.
“A guaranteed cut in real property taxes is highly preferable to the all but certain 4 percent tax increase that a cap would offer,” said Senator Johnson. “I hope the Assembly acts on this legislation so that we can send it to Governor Paterson for his consideration. This is the kind of relief that Long Island taxpayers desperately need.”
In addition to NY-STOP, the Senate was set to act on two bills that would provide additional relief to taxpayers, including mandate relief legislation to reduce costs to school districts, municipalities and local taxpayers, and a measure to provide enhanced financial incentives for school districts which merge or share a superintendent.
|